Blogs for Borders IS NO LONGER UPDATED! America is awakened to the insane policies of illegal immigration, amnesty, unsecure borders opposed by bloggers dedicated to American sovereignty. -- Original Feed!
Facebook Group Still Active! Join Us!

Thursday, September 09, 2010

Appeals Court Blocks PA Town's 4 Year Old Immigration Law

By Michael Rubinkam, GOPUSA: ALLENTOWN, PA: A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Hazleton, Pa., may not enforce its crackdown on illegal immigrants, dealing another blow to 4-year-old regulations that inspired similar measures around the country.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said that Hazleton's Illegal Immigration Relief Act usurped the federal government's exclusive power to regulate immigration. "It is ... not our job to sit in judgment of whether state and local frustration about federal immigration policy is warranted. We are, however, required to intervene when states and localities directly undermine the federal objectives embodied in statutes enacted by Congress," wrote Chief Judge Theodore McKee.

The northeastern Pennsylvania city had sought to fine landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and deny business permits to companies that give them jobs. A companion measure required prospective tenants to register with City Hall and pay for a rental permit. Mayor Lou Barletta had pushed the measures in 2006 after two illegal immigrants were charged in a fatal shooting. The Republican mayor, now mounting his third try for Congress, argued that illegal immigrants brought drugs, crime and gangs to the city of more than 30,000 and overwhelmed police, schools and hospitals.

Hispanic groups and illegal immigrants sued to overturn the measures, and a federal judge struck them down following a trial in 2007. The laws have never been enforced. . . . [Read More]

Tags: Hazleton, Pennsylvania, immigration law, Federal Judge, illegal aliens To share the post, click on "Post Link." Please mention / link to Blogs for Borders. Thanks!


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Suppose the whole country were on fire and Washington decided to do nothing about it. Would the people be obliged to let it burn, or would it be their civic duty to try to put it out? Enough said.

9/26/10, 10:20 AM  
Blogger Bill Smith said...

Anonymous has made an exceptional point. Thank you. And I am going to twitter this one :)

9/26/10, 2:37 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home